Predicting the Campbell Soil Water Retention Function: Comparing Visible–Near‐Infrared Spectroscopy with Classical Pedotransfer Function
In this study, we anchor the Campbell model at the water content at −1000 cm H2O matric potential [log(1000)= pF 3]. Agricultural soil samples with a wide textural range from across Denmark were used. Soil water retention was measured at a number of matric potentials between pF 1 and 3. The soil wat...
Lưu vào:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Đồng tác giả: | |
| Định dạng: | BB |
| Ngôn ngữ: | English |
| Thông tin xuất bản: |
2020
|
| Chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | http://tailieuso.tlu.edu.vn/handle/DHTL/9445 |
| Từ khóa: |
Thêm từ khóa bạn đọc
Không có từ khóa, Hãy là người đầu tiên gắn từ khóa cho biểu ghi này!
|
| Tóm tắt: | In this study, we anchor the Campbell model at the water content at −1000 cm H2O matric potential [log(1000)= pF 3]. Agricultural soil samples with a wide textural range from across Denmark were used. Soil water retention was measured at a number of matric potentials between pF 1 and 3. The soil water content at pF 3 and Campbell b were both well predicted using either a soil‐fines‐based pedotransfer function or vis–NIR spectroscopy. The resulting Campbell function anchored at pF 3 compared closely to measured water retention data for a majority of soils. The ability of the two methods to also predict field average SWRC was evaluated for three fields. Field average, predicted SWRC compared well with field average measured data, with vis–NIR overall performing better. |
|---|